Three Common Questions After SEC Approves ETH ETF in the US
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently approved the listing of an Ethereum native token ETF, which has raised questions among industry observers about the motivation behind this decision and its potential impact on Ethereum and other major cryptocurrencies.
Question 1: Is there a political motive behind the decision?
Change in cryptocurrency regulations?
Impact of legislative actions
Support from former President Trump
Question 2: What is the impact on Ethereum?
Increased institutional interest
Potential changes in market dynamics
Clarification of regulatory status
Positive impact on the Ethereum ecosystem
Staking economy
Consolidation of Ethereum’s position
Question 3: What are the opportunities for other blockchains?
Prospects for other chains
Need for support from financial institutions
The timing of the SEC’s approval has sparked speculation about the political motives behind it. Just a few days before the announcement, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the important cryptocurrency bill FIT 21. Additionally, there have been recent efforts by both parties in Congress to repeal controversial SEC cryptocurrency custody accounting rules, indicating a possible shift in the regulatory environment.
In these legislative actions, the Democratic Party has been actively involved, suggesting a softening stance by the U.S. government towards cryptocurrencies. President Biden’s decision not to veto the cryptocurrency market structure bill FIT 21 shows a major concession. This political background may have influenced SEC Chairman Gary Gensler’s attitude towards cryptocurrency regulations, possibly considering a stricter stance as a political burden.
Furthermore, the recent support for cryptocurrencies by former President Trump has also had an impact. Gensler may see continued refusal of an ETH ETF as politically unfavorable, especially considering Trump’s support.
The approval of the ETH ETF is expected to significantly increase institutional interest in Ethereum. This move not only serves as an endorsement but also provides a familiar investment tool for various types of investors, including individual 401(k) holders and large hedge funds.
The co-founder of Framework Ventures, Michael Anderson, points out that many institutions may be eager to adjust their strategies and infrastructure to accommodate the new Ethereum ETF. The entry of these funds could bring more users into the Ethereum network, especially as fund managers may not be allowed to stake the ETH they hold, prompting new investors to stake ETH themselves for earning rewards.
This approval also brings clarity to Ethereum’s regulatory status. Jake Chervinsky, General Counsel at Variant, emphasizes that if these funds are allowed to trade, it may mean that un-staked ETH is not considered a security by the SEC, which could encourage more institutions to enter the market, as they have been hesitant due to regulatory uncertainty.
The launch of the ETH ETF could have far-reaching implications for the Ethereum ecosystem. The potential buying pressure from these funds would benefit Ethereum and Layer 2 solutions. Ethereum’s token burning mechanism, which burns tokens with each transaction, could see a new deflationary trend if trading volume increases due to market dynamics driven by the ETF.
The impact on the staking economy is another key area to watch. As platforms like Lido make it easier for individuals to stake ETH, the potential removal of more ETH from circulation due to the ETF could exacerbate concerns about the centralization of staked ETH.
The approval of the ETH ETF is akin to an endorsement of Ethereum and could solidify its leadership position. Michael Anderson suggests that even a fraction of institutional funds flowing into Bitcoin ETFs could consolidate Ethereum’s dominant position in terms of market share and valuation.
This development could also create opportunities for other blockchains such as Cardano, Solana, and Ripple. However, these blockchains face additional regulatory barriers. While Ethereum’s position is unclear to the SEC, assets like Solana’s SOL and Cardano’s ADA are clearly classified as securities, complicating their path to ETF approval.
Financial institutions like CME play a crucial role in the adoption of Bitcoin and Ethereum futures. Other cryptocurrencies would need similar support from financial institutions to achieve similar adoption, which is currently uncertain.
ETF
ETH
SEC
